Each group will determine what time they will meet each week. Feedback will be virtual. The bi-weekly didactics will be set up at a time determine to be convenient for all college of medicine students.
The schedule for this remote elective is :
1.
During the first week of the semester: CCM and COM students will
attend two training and information sessions. After the first session,
students will receive an information packet and questionnaire in which
they detail their artistic strengths/interests, any relevant experience
with people with cognitive disorders (CD), and their availability for
meeting times throughout
the semester. This
information will allow the course graduate assistant to create small
groups consisting of at least one CCM student, COM student, patient,
and caregiver. Ideally, all group members will have a shared background
and/or an interest in one or more arts-based approaches (e.g., creative
movement, vocal performance, improv theater).
2.
During Weeks 1 and 2 of the semester: While the graduate coordinators
are setting up the groups and scheduling weekly meetings, the course
supervisors will hold one training and information session for student
participants.
Dr. Shatz will lead a session about
memory and concepts underlying the characteristics of major
neurodegenerative dementias, the role of the arts in cognition and
function, and practical issues related to communication challenges or
behaviors in individuals experiencing cognitive impairment.
Dr.
Fiol will lead a session that introduces a number of different
arts-based, collaborative strategies for working with people with CDs.
Both
supervisors, alongside the social workers who are working closely with
the patients, will provide specialized guidance and lead students
through a series of arts-based improvisation exercises that will help to
instill values for spontaneity, adaptability and active listening
required when working with people with CDs.
4.
Following weeks: students are expected to be in regular communication
with the course graduate assistant in order to schedule regular weekly
meeting with a patient/caregiver at a time that works for everyone.
Although they may exceed these requirements, student participants are
required to meet in these small groups for a minimum of eight one-hour
sessions during each semester.
5. Initial Self-Assessment and Weekly Reflection Assignments
During
the first or second week of the course, after the initial training
sessions but before meeting with the patient and caregiver, students
will submit a reflection paper in which they critically examine their
personal backgrounds and expectations for this experience and articulate
a number of different learning objectives for this experience.
Then,
after their first session in small groups, students will meet with supervisors for evaluation of previous sessions, identification of any issues with patient/care partner interactions or session content, and plan for next sessions. Working with
people with CDs requires unlearning and relearning a
whole new set of skills, and it is expected that there will be bumps
along the way. The course grad assistant and the supervisors assist
students throughout this proces. The weekly supervisor sessions should
address the following questions:
1. Overall how would you describe the last session?
2. What were the most successful aspects of the collaboration?
3. What were the least successful aspects of the collaboration?
4. How do interactions with patients influence your understanding of cognitive impairment?
5.
How do interactions with caregivers inform you about communication
strategies with cognitively impaired individuals? With their
caregivers?
6. Could you have used more or less direction before or during the session?
7. What information are you lacking and need for future planning?
8. In what way do cultural or generational experiences influence
interactions?
9. In what ways would you like to sustain or alter the process to create a better experience for all members of the group?
6.
COM students (optional for CCM students) will also be assigned biweekly
readings on topics related to the following. Students will rotate in
creating an on-line power point review, discussion, and/or case example
based on the reading. During the first week of the two week cycle, the
designated student will create a presentation, review with faculty, and
identify discussion points. During the second week of the cycle, the
student will present the powerpoint and co-lead the discussion with all
the remaining students. Materials used for this section will be archived
to use as resources for future classes.
1. The network basis of cognition.
2. Brain networks underlying memory, language, behavior, and music
3.
Brain networks underlying major neurodegenerative dementias
(Alzheimer's, Lewy body disease/Parkinson's disease with dementia,
Frontotemporal dementia syndromes): how symptoms reflect network
dysfunction
4. Mechanisms of neurodegeneration
5. Mechanisms of neurogenesis and cognitive reserve
6. Neurology of memory
7. Neurology of music and memory
8. Concept of mild behavioral impairment in neurodegenerative disease
9. Neurological basis of behaviors in neurodegenerative disease
10. Medical approaches to behavior management (and their limitations)
11. Non-medical approaches to behavior management
12. Principles of caregiver education and support
13. Dementia and Alzheimer's disease in art and literature: stigma and bias
7. Final Self-Assessment
At
the completion of the course, students will turn in a self-assessment
that asks them to reflect on their process of learning and discovery.
After the students answer each of the following questions, the
supervisor(s) will provide feedback in response, ultimately resulting in
a summary conclusion. This provides both the students and the
supervisors a sense of next steps.
• In general, how would you assess your performance during this course?
• Could you have used more or less direction prior to starting the sessions? During the sessions?
• What did/do you enjoy and what did you not enjoy about the sessions?
• In what ways did the experience differ from your expectations?
•
List your agreed-upon learning objectives for the course. Evaluate your
work based on your learning objectives--are there areas in which you
feel that you could use more focused work? Do you feel that you made
good progress in each of the specified learning objectives? How might
you achieve greater mastery in the areas of your specific learning
objectives?
• Could you see yourself doing this on an everyday basis in the future? Why or why not?
•
From this learning experience, what skill sets do you feel you've
developed and what have you learned you need to develop further in order
to pursue your long-term goals or next steps? How can we help you get
there?
• In what ways did this experience alter your understanding of people with cognitive impairment and the caregiving role?